Articles & Resources

Big Ideas

Engaged Work Places

 

Marcus Buckingham, Author: “First, Break all the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently” and “Now, Discover Your Strengths,” from “Fast Company” interview, August 2001.

 

   In a study of workplace productivity, Buckingham distilled 12 core issues representing a barometer of work-unit strength.  He vividly showed the direct link between people’s engagement and their performance.  The big question he asked:  “What does a strong and vibrant workplace look like?”  According to his study, the most “engaged” workplaces were 50% more likely to have lower turnover, 56% more likely to have higher-than-average productivity and 27% more likely to report higher profitability.  Buckingham found, though, that only 25% of the workplaces fell into the most “engaged” category.  In addition, workplaces within companies showed great variance in terms of work-unit strength.  Buckingham concluded that companies are made up of many sub-cultures, driven by local conditions.  His study clearly showed that CEOs of companies that improved the ratio of “engaged” employees over a four-year period saw dramatically improved P&L budgets, while those whose ratios fell missed their P&L budgets.             Buckingham believes that the deployment of human assets will be the major challenge for CEOs in the coming decade.  “But that’s not about organizational development or workplace design.  It’s about psychology.  It’s about getting one more individual to be more productive, more focused, more fulfilled than he was yesterday.”  In order to predict how engaged employees are, Buckingham asks a dozen simple questions:  
  • Do I know what is expected of me at work?
  • Do I have the tools and materials to do my job right?
  • At work do I have the opportunity to do what I do best?
  • In the past seven days have I received praise or recognition for my work?
  • Does my supervisor or someone at work seem to care about me as a person?
  • Is there someone at work who encouraged my development?
  • Do my opinions seem to count?
  • Does the mission or purpose of my company make me feel my job is important?
  • Are my coworkers committed to quality work?
  • Do I have a best friend at work?
  • In the past six months, has someone at work talked to me about my progress?
  • In the past year have I had opportunities at work to learn and grow?
 Buckingham concludes, “The beautiful thing about a culture that is built by focusing on individual strengths is that no one can steal it.  Any advantage that’s hard to steal is an advantage that lasts.”

Analysis by Tim Schroeder,

Buckingham points out that the beliefs and behaviors of middle managers are important determinants of workplace strength.  The middle managers are the “keepers” of the workplace culture.  It is important to measure performance in ways that really matter, linking employee morale, customer satisfaction, and employee “engagement.” 

            The traditional measure of “making numbers” does nothing to improve or support a customer focused, strong and vibrant workplace.  The knowledge and talent inside the company can deliver solutions to business problems better than using benchmarks to measure your company against others.  CEOs fixate on “How is our average performance improving over time?” and “How do we stack up against our competitors?”  The more important measure is the ratio of employees who are “engaged” (loyal and productive) to those who are not engaged (just putting in time) or disengaged (unhappy and spreading discontent).  Bettering the US ratio of 26% engaged, 55% not engaged and 19% disengaged represents a significant opportunity to differentiate your company.

           Webber puts customers at the center of the corporate culture.  Customer service problems, especially ones caused by disorganization, can’t be solved by training or behavior enhancement.  A positive end-to-end customer experience requires planning across functional business unit lines and across company lines. 

                   Improvement starts with getting the operations people of the company into contact with the customers.  Let them hear the customers’ words.  A positive relationship with customers and employees is the most important thing that differentiates your company’s value proposition from your competitors’.

Aligning Process to Customer Outcomes

Allen Webber founding editor “Fast Company” September 2001, from interviews with various founders and CEOs regarding the new “Customer Economy” In interviews with founders of companies and CEOs about customer service, Webber heard that, “The customer economy will generate much pain to companies, but at this point, pain isn’t the companies’ biggest issue.  The biggest issue is that they are disorganized.  Disorganization turns into customer problems, whether it’s bad service or bad tires.”  The executives told Webber that, “You can take any management discipline from the past few years: TQM, Reengineering, CRM…  The failure has been addressing behavioral issues…  The business models that we use today do not address delivery of an enhanced customer experience.  Until marketing, sales and customer service converge in a way that adds value, we’ll keep disappointing the ultimate customer.”

According to the executives, “Gaps in distribution, fulfillment and inventory management detract from an end-to-end customer experience.”  Furthermore, “no matter what channel you’re talking about or working through, the challenge for the company is to focus on its customer’s specific individual needs.”  Webber quotes them as saying, “The problem as I see it is that we’re so enamored with providing what we need to fulfill the transaction, we forget to provide what we need to have in order to build a relationship.”  Weber concludes, “Ultimately, customers want a relationship…that reflects their attitudes…  Consumers want to invest in the relationship.”  In short, “Forward thinking companies always base their measurements on customer outcomes.  Are you lining up your reward and compensation structure around customer outcomes?  That’s what matters in the end.”

 The implication of this message for the corporation was clear.  “The only way to succeed at this is to drive the customer centric mentality down into the organization.  Get the developers into contact with the customers.”  What Webber heard about creating a customer focus was that a company must “change the nature of the conversation with the customers.  Find the biggest pain point, and then go to work to reduce it.”  The executives recommended using “an old tool, the balanced score-card.  Look at efficiency, effectiveness, and customer satisfaction.  Draw the link between [employee morale], customer satisfaction and profitability.  It is the fastest way to remind companies that they are in business to serve customers.”  Finally, they emphasized the need to “move from the transactional to the experiential… build customer participation into your brand and make the relationship one that is based on experience.”

 

Making Life Easier for the Customer

 

 

From Michael Hammer, Author of “The Agenda: What Every Business Must Do to Dominate in the Decade,”  (Crown Business, 2001) 

Hammer is blunt in his analysis: “Customers are no longer supplicants for scarce goods…  Roles have changed and sellers have become supplicants for scarce buyers.”  He believes that, “Companies that re-engineer to face the customer, to serve the customer and to make life easier for the customer will flourish.  Those that don’t will perish.”  In his opinion, “Financial measures--profitability, return on investment, discounted cash flow or any of the technically complex measures used by financial engineers--tell you little, if anything, of what you need to know about your business.”  The fact is that “the fundamental language of business is about things like customer satisfaction, speed and error rates.”

Looking to the near future, Hammer predicts “the next big thing that will dominate business discourse for the coming decade is the destruction of walls between enterprises.”  In that transition, “Further reengineering will depend on qualities that emanate from the right side of the brain: devotion, trust, empathy, and all of their touchy-feely cousins.”  Hammer believes that the new leader “must be a charismatic persuader, someone to whom others can relate - a person who can set sights higher than next quarter’s earnings report.  They have a sense of empathetic identification.”

Customer Maniacs

Andy Pearson of Tricon, interviewed by David Dorsey, Fast Co., August 2001

In commenting about fostering positive attitudes within an organization, Pearson told Dorsey that, “Great leaders find a balance between getting results and how they get them.  A lot of people make the mistake of thinking that getting results is all there is to the job.  They go after results without building a team or without building an organization that has the capacity to change.  Your real job is to get results and to do it in a way that makes your organization a great place to work--a place where people enjoy coming to work instead of just taking orders and hitting this month’s numbers.”  Pearson believes that, “It is less important to issue orders than it is to seek answers and ideas from below.”  He has experienced that.  “We need to make an enormous effort so that people feel that their individual contribution is vital to our success, starting with [middle] managers.”  According to Pearson, seeking answers from middle managers requires a relentless sacrifice of shoe leather.  He says, “I get one or two letters a week from people saying ‘I can’t believe the founding chairman of the company would come and spend an hour just to talk with me.’  I get letters that would just bring tears to our eyes.”

Pearson quotes Tricon CEO Novak in saying that when these principles are applied, “Our same store sales will go up, not down.  You never go down when you’re satisfying customers.  We’re a company of customer maniacs.”  For Pearson, the real lesson is that, “Ultimately it’s all about having more genuine concern for the other person.  There’s a big difference between being tough and being tough-minded.  There’s an important aspect that has to do with humility.  But I’ve been modestly disappointed at how hard it is to get leaders to act that way.  I think it’s going to take a generation of pounding away on this theme.  We’ve got a half dozen or so real leaders in our company, but we don’t have 20 or 30. You know what it takes?  Role models”.

 

Growth Plan

Are You Happy With How You're Growing Your Business?

Research has shown that having a clear, inspiring sense of direction dramatically increases the effectiveness of people in organizations. Passion about direction engages hearts as well as minds.

Learn more... 

Top Talent Selection

Are You Finding and Hiring the Right People?

Hiring the wrong person or missing out on the right person costs a bundle. The cost of poor selection can run over 25 times base compensation. Hire right, or pay and pay.

Learn more... 

Smart Partnering

Are Your People Partnering Successfully?

Businesses grow by making connections. The skill most crucial to propagating connections is partnering. If you want to build great partnerships, you need to know how to be a smart partner.

Learn more... 

Retention & Development

Are You Keeping and Leveraging Your Best People?

The cost of poor retention rivals the cost of poor selection. Get valid data on why your best people stay, and why they leave, or expect torturous levels of top-talent turnover.

Learn more... 

Sales Performance

Are Your Sales Teams Delivering Exceptional Revenue Results?

Superior Top-Line Results delight all stakeholders and form a positive basis for a company's leaders to manage relationships with investors, boards of directors, and the financial community.

Learn more...